However, I'm curious how
Copperhead the company can send these letters demanding that the 50%
co-owner do this or that. As equal owner, couldn't he respond to these
letters by asking the company lawyers to send a letter back to the CEO
making similar demands? Is the CEO "more in control" than the CTO
because CEO is a higher position, even though they're equal partners?
Also, the tweets seem to have been deleted, did anyone archive them?
Micay is still a majority shareholder of Copperhead and thus, any
damage he does to the company with this leaking (and media coverage) is
damaging himself and the Company we've all worked for.
says quite clearly that you a) believe copyright belongs to the
company, b) want him to give all access to infrastructure, c) revoke his
access to Copperhead branding.
What exactly have I got wrong or over-simplified?
I think @CopperheadOS changed their twitter ID to @DanielMicay. If you
go to Google's cache of @CopperheadOS  and click on the date next to
one of the tweets (example ), it redirects to the live version of the
tweet under @DanielMicay.
 May 22 https://twitter.com/CopperheadOS/status/998953746833944576
> This account covers the technical side of CopperheadOS.
>Please send all questions about sales to email@example.com.
>The customer support system should be used for official support or the subreddit (https://www.reddit.com/r/CopperheadOS/ ) for community support.
> Can't help with either here."
These conflicts should be resolved by the board.
Lesson learned - we started Copperhead as privacy advocates and hackers, not MBA infused business developers.
hoping there is a peaceful resolution to this. It's VERY unfortunate
that Daniel Micay is airing dirty laundry - internal confidential
documents that are directed towards him (ironically, from a @gmail.com
account,as he refuses to answer from his @copperhead.co address now).
ESPECIALLY from a company asset (@copperheadOS) that is damaging to
Copperhead the company, our users and our employees.
As it currently stands, Daniel Micay has been and still is a majority shareholder of Copperhead.
I'm interested and open to discussions regarding these issues. Feel free to email me - firstname.lastname@example.org
What you're doing is despicable and unfair. Please resign.
not my story to tell at all, as someone who's not a Rust core
contributor or anything (and certainly wasn't at the time), but http://slash-r-slash-rust.github.io/archived/2u1dme.html
is part of it. (IIRC the /r/rust mods archived that thread on GitHub as
a compromise between deleting something from Reddit and leaving
something Googleable with his name.) There was a lot of dirty laundry in
public and my impression is that neither he nor the Rust core
maintainers left that situation happy.
>ironically, from a @gmail.com account,as he refuses to answer from his @copperhead.co address now
now that the cat is out of the bag: if you notice, the letters are
addressed to email@example.com because he refused to answer (or use
PGP regarding these answers, which has me believe he's okay with Google
reading our internal drama) using his Copperhead email address.